NextPrevious

CourtSpeak: Hudson v. Michigan Exclusionary Rule Case

Decisions Read more from
Chapter The Roberts Court (2005–present)

Justice Antonin Scalia (majority): “What the knock and announce rule has never protected … is one’s interest in preventing the government from seeing or taking evidence described in a warrant. Since the interests that were violated in this case have nothing to do with the seizure of the evidence, the exclusionary rule is inapplicable.”

Justice Stephen Breyer (dissenting): “Today’s opinion is … deeply troubling. It represents a significant departure from the Court’s precedents. And it weakens, perhaps destroys, much of the practical value of the Court’s knock-and-announce protection.”

Close

This is a web preview of the "The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book" app. Many features only work on your mobile device. If you like what you see, we hope you will consider buying. Get the App