The Burger Court (1969–86)

First Amendment

How did the Burger Court deal with obscenity law?

The Burger Court formulated a new standard for obscenity cases in Miller v. California (1973). Chief Justice Warren Burger’s opinion established a new three-part test to guide jurors in obscenity cases. The three-prong test provided that material is obscene if: “(a) the average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest; (b) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and (c) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.”


This is a web preview of the "The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book" app. Many features only work on your mobile device. If you like what you see, we hope you will consider buying. Get the App