NextPrevious

The Rehnquist Court (1986–2005)

Criminal Justice

Is it an unreasonable search when officers hover in a helicopter 400 feet above a home and observe illegal activity?

No, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Florida v. Riley (1989) that a law enforcement officer’s naked-eye observation of a partially covered greenhouse at a residence from a helicopter circling 400 feet above did not constitute a “search” within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. “Any member of the public could legally have been flying over Riley’s property in a helicopter at the altitude of 400 feet and could have observed Riley’s greenhouse,” the Court wrote. “The police officer did no more.”



Close

This is a web preview of the "The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book" app. Many features only work on your mobile device. If you like what you see, we hope you will consider buying. Get the App