NextPrevious

The Rehnquist Court (1986–2005)

Criminal Justice

What did the Rehnquist Court say about the use of thermal imagers?

In its 2001 decision Kyllo v. United States, a sharply divided (5–4) Court ruled that the use of a thermal imager was a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. This means that the government cannot use a thermal imager to scan a home without first obtaining a warrant. In somewhat of a surprise, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote for the majority: “We think that obtaining by sense-enhancing technology any information regarding the interior of the home that could not otherwise have been obtained without physical ‘intrusion into a constitutionally protected area,’ constitutes a search—at least where (as here) the technology in question is not in general public use.”



Close

This is a web preview of the "The Handy Supreme Court Answer Book" app. Many features only work on your mobile device. If you like what you see, we hope you will consider buying. Get the App